Speculation about the capabilities of the anticipated new sensor on the next Apple Watch.
Even though SpO2 measures were included in the Apple Watch 6 a few years ago, they were not included in the Apple Watch 7.
According to recent sources, a skin- or body-temperature sensor for the Apple Watch seems to be a more probable addition than functions like blood pressure monitoring and blood glucose monitoring. “Apple is intending to add a body temperature sensor to the watch as early as this year,” stated Apple source Mark Gurman in April.
New watchOS 9 features, as well as the debut of an Apple Watch SE 2 and a tough watch for outdoor activities, are also a certainty, according to Gurman. However, the temperature sensor has piqued our curiosity because of what it may signify for the next Apple Watch 8. What’s the plan here? Do you think an app that measures your core body temperature will be developed in the future? Is it possible to tell whether anything is wrong just on your body temperature?
Speculation regarding the Apple Watch 8’s body temperature sensor is, of course, a waste of time right now. As a result, we’re eager to see how the Apple Watch may enhance or extend its capabilities in the next year. Here’s everything we know so far about the anticipated Apple Watch 8 temperature reader, and how it compares to the competition.
What is the purpose of the Apple Watch 8’s body temperature sensor?
The body temperature sensor in the Apple Watch 8 should be able to detect changes in your core body temperature, right? Maybe, but who knows? The Apple Watch 8’s body temperature sensor, unlike the heart rate and blood oxygen sensors, may not be able to provide immediate readings when you’re concerned about your temperature.
For example, Gurman predicts that the temperature sensor will be utilised to track women’s reproductive health. The Apple Women’s Health Study shed light on PCOS, and Apple Fitness Plus created a post-pregnancy fitness collection, as part of Apple Health’s current focus on women’s health.
Ovulation may be detected more reliably using wrist skin temperature than with basal body temperature, according to Swiss researchers at the University Hospital Zurich’s Department of Reproductive Endocrinology. “Wrist skin temperature continually recorded throughout sleep is more sensitive than BBT for identifying ovulation,” the research found for women interested in increasing their chances of becoming pregnant.
In terms of women’s health monitoring, Apple Health may benefit from collecting wrist skin temperature data from the Apple Watch. Apple Watch 8 would be an excellent wristwatch for ladies if this feature was included in the next model. However, the sensor’s use is restricted since it does not help users who cannot or do not want to monitor fertility.
Reading the temperature of a person’s skin as they sleep might be a good compromise. Sleep monitoring on Apple Watch has been improved in watchOS 8 to include data on the wearer’s respiration rate (or breathing rate).
Temperature sensors may be expanded to provide on-demand skin temperature measurements or proactive alerts in future watchOS upgrades or versions. If your skin temperature is over average, it might be a sign of sickness, stress, or perhaps an underlying condition you are unaware of.
A comparison of the Apple Watch 8 and its competitors
It’s not groundbreaking to include a temperature sensor in a wristwatch or health device. The Whoop 4.0 and Oura Ring Generation 3 fitness trackers, for example, can measure your skin temperature in relation to preparedness and recuperation. If your skin temperature is extremely high, it can imply you’re unwell or off your typical pattern. If the Oura Ring detects a change in temperature, it will even prescribe a rest day.
The Fitbit Sense and Fitbit Charge 5 are two of the greatest Fitbit models, both of which have skin-temperature sensors. These devices monitor your skin temperature throughout the night to check whether it differs from your own baseline, which might indicate illness or other health issues. ‘
Those who have a Fitbit Premium membership may also receive more extensive information on skin temperature variance patterns. When it comes to sleep monitoring, Fitbit has the advantage, but Apple Watch 8’s ability to measure core body temperature might tilt the scales in its favour.
There is no skin temperature sensor in the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, however it is expected to be included in the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5. Samsung’s wristwatch may outperform the Apple Watch 8 in terms of health features, thanks to the possibility of FDA certification for its current blood pressure sensor.
Even if we know all there is to know about the upcoming Apple Watch 8, we should still be wary of third-party rumours. If not a body temperature sensor, we’d want to see something else in the next-generation Apple Watch.